I have posted a new "Apologetics" article on the "Apologetics Page".    If  this is your forte,  or if it is an area which you like to particularly study,  then you might find this article refreshingly different than anything else you have ever read or studied.  It is called:  Paul's "Foolish" Apologetics.  I'd be curious to know what some of you Theologian's  out there think?  I'm not looking for your approval or disapproval of my ideas.  I'm more interested in your opinion of Paul's techniques.  And why you think they always works?  and whether or not you use these simple principles yourself,  as the basis for your own apologetic work?  If not,  then what do you know that is better?